MANILA (UCAN): Critics have accused the Philippine Supreme Court of making marriage annulments easier by modifying the boundaries of the condition of psychological incapacity, a legal technicality widely used as grounds to dissolve marriages in the only Christian country apart from the Vatican where divorce is not legal.
Psychological incapacity is defined as a condition that prevents a spouse from complying with fundamental marital obligations such as sexual fidelity, honesty or reasonable behaviour.
Previously, to annul a marriage using psychological incapacity, it had to be proven that the spouse had the condition in question at the time of marriage, something that was difficult to do if the couple had been married for a significant period.
However, the Supreme Court reset the rules on May 12 by applying the term to behaviour manifesting during a marriage.
The ruling was seen by legal experts as a compromise to placate religious conservatives strongly opposed to divorce and a growing number of people in the Philippines who support it.
‘This more relaxed interpretation means more dissolved marriages. And if a party can bribe a judge, then their marriage can easily be dissolved’
Alan Gupta of the Knights of Columbus
Father Ranhilio Aquino, dean of the San Beda Graduate School of Law, said the court appeared to have modified the concept of psychological incapacity by borrowing from canon law and applying it to family law to allow annulments.
It probably thought “the canonical category of psychological incapacity would be malleable enough to allow for the dissolution of dysfunctional marriages,” Father Aquino explained.
Anti-divorce advocates said a more relaxed interpretation of psychological incapacity could lead to abuses by corrupt judges.
“This more relaxed interpretation means more dissolved marriages. And if a party can bribe a judge, then their marriage can easily be dissolved,” Alan Gupta of the Knights of Columbus, said, adding that the Supreme Court has given unbridled power to judges to grant a divorce.
Others thought the Supreme Court had legalised divorce in all but name
“This ruling is akin to divorce. Only Congress should handle issues like this, not the Supreme Court,” one person, who wished to remain anonymous, said.
As we celebrate the 500 years of Christianity in the Philippines. The Chaplaincy to Filipino Migrants organises an on-line talk every Tuesday at 9.00pm. You can join us at:
https://www.Facebook.com/CFM-Gifted-to-give-101039001847033
“There is a bill pending that seeks to legalise divorce. As long as it remains a bill and not a law, divorce remains outlawed in the Philippines and the Supreme Court has no power to rule otherwise,” they said.
